44 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
44 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
|
---
|
||
|
|
model: claude-fable-5[1m]
|
||
|
|
service: claude
|
||
|
|
timestamp: 2026-06-10T17:12:26Z
|
||
|
|
git_ref: datad_service
|
||
|
|
diff_cmd: git log -1 -p --follow -- ai/prompt-io/claude/20260610T171226Z_64181219_prompt_io.md
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
NOTE: diff-ref mode entry (code committed in the same
|
||
|
|
commit as this log); backfilled from the live dev
|
||
|
|
session transcript per the `/prompt-io` skill rules.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> `git log -1 -p --follow -- piker/clearing/_ems.py`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Generated: new `open_brokerd_dialog()` signature
|
||
|
|
`(brokermod, exec_mode, fqme=None, portal=None,
|
||
|
|
loglevel=None)` with an inner `@acm
|
||
|
|
acquire_live_portal()` that yields the caller-provided
|
||
|
|
`portal` override (the `piker ledger` path) else
|
||
|
|
`maybe_spawn_brokerd(brokermod.name)` — designated THE
|
||
|
|
one place a live, credentialed `brokerd.<broker>` gets
|
||
|
|
booted post-split. The eager
|
||
|
|
`portal.open_context(trades_endpoint, ...)`
|
||
|
|
construction moved inside that block so the paper
|
||
|
|
short-circuit never acquires a live portal.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> `git log -1 -p --follow -- piker/accounting/cli.py`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Key analysis (verbatim from session):
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- `feed.portals` had exactly ONE trading consumer:
|
||
|
|
`piker/clearing/_ems.py:671` (`portal =
|
||
|
|
feed.portals[brokermod]`) — the single coupling
|
||
|
|
forcing feed + trading into one actor.
|
||
|
|
- `piker ledger` (`accounting/cli.py:100-157`) is a
|
||
|
|
hidden consumer: it calls `broker_init()` directly,
|
||
|
|
spawns its own ad-hoc actor and passes the portal
|
||
|
|
positionally — the new signature must keep an
|
||
|
|
explicit `portal:` override param for this path.
|
||
|
|
- stage sequencing: clearing decouple lands BEFORE the
|
||
|
|
feed cutover, otherwise `feed.portals` would hand
|
||
|
|
emsd a `datad` portal and live `open_trade_dialog`
|
||
|
|
RPC would fail.
|